Skip to main content

Alvin Lucier’s “I am sitting in a room” (1969)

 

The recording “I am sitting in a room” by Alvin Lucier plays with an again and again resumed sound/voice on tape. In the following I will try to showcase my thoughts during each replay. This will look now a bit experimental, as it is, but maybe it helps to understand what I thought while listening. My comments are the ones in blue.

Replay#1: I am sitting in a room different from the one you are in now. I am recording the sound of my speaking voice and I am going to play it back into the room again and again until the resonant frequencies of the room reinforce themselves so that any semblance of my speech, with perhaps the exception of rhythm, is destroyed. What you will hear, then, are the natural resonant frequencies of the room articulated by speech. I regard this activity not so much as a demonstration of a physical fact, but more as a way to smooth out any irregularities my speech might have. (- 01:36 min)

Replay#2: I am sitting in a room different from the one you are in now. I am recording the sound of my speaking voice and I am going to play it back into the room again and again until the resonant frequencies of the room reinforce themselves so that any semblance of my speech, with perhaps the exception of rhythm, is destroyed. What you will hear, then, are the natural resonant frequencies of the room articulated by speech. I regard this activity not so much as a demonstration of a physical fact, but more as a way to smooth out any irregularities my speech might have. (- 03:15 min) Here, the stutterers in the area of the “R” notes become more prominent.

Replay#3: I am sitting in a room different from the one you are in now. I am recording the sound of my speaking voice and I am going to play it back into the room again and again until the resonant frequencies of the room reinforce themselves so that any semblance of my speech, with perhaps the exception of rhythm, is destroyed. What you will hear, then, are the natural resonant frequencies of the room articulated by speech. I regard this activity not so much as a demonstration of a physical fact, but more as a way to smooth out any irregularities my speech might have. (- 04:44 min) “S” tones appear sharper, almost like a weak whistle.

Replay#4: I am sitting in a room different from the one you are in now. I am recording the sound of my speaking voice and I am going to play it back into the room again and again until the resonant frequencies of the room reinforce themselves so that any semblance of my speech, with perhaps the exception of rhythm, is destroyed. What you will hear, then, are the natural resonant frequencies of the room articulated by speech. I regard this activity not so much as a demonstration of a physical fact, but more as a way to smooth out any irregularities my speech might have. (- 06:16 min) Some words start to disappear and sound kind of mumble to me. Also, the overall sound changed more drastically from replay three to four than it did before. Some tones suddenly have an echo, which sounds similar to noise out of some of the first movies about aliens.

Replay#5: I am sitting in a room *waves of sound appear* different from the one you are in now. I am recording the sound of my speaking voice and I am going to play it back into the room again and again until the resonant frequencies of the room reinforce themselves so that any semblance of my speech *the word speech is clearly identifiable*, with perhaps the exception of rhythm, “is destroyed” *“is destroyed” clearly recognizable*. What you will hear, then, are the natural resonant frequencies of the room articulated by speech. I regard this activity *“this activity” also recognizable* not so much as a demonstration of a physical fact, but more as a way to smooth out any irregularities my speech might have. (- 07:46 min) Individual tones appear flatter. It seems like the tones start to align with each other. Also, it sounds as if there are some additional tones added which reverberate similar like a glass bottle in which someone blows would do.

Replay#6: I am sitting in a room *waves of sound appear* different from the one you are in now. I am recording the sound of my speaking voice and I am going to play it back into the room again and again until the resonant frequencies of the room reinforce themselves so that any semblance of my speech, with perhaps the exception of rhythm, is destroyed. What you will hear, then, are the natural resonant frequencies of the room articulated by speech. I regard this activity not so much as a demonstration of a physical fact, but more as a way to smooth out any irregularities my speech might have. (- 09:18 min) Now, I am not even sure if I would understand have the words if I wouldn’t be able to read them along. And, to be very honest Lucier’s voice almost sound like Harry Potter speaking parseltongue.

Replay#7: I am sitting in a room *waves of sound appear* different from the one *even higher tones* you are in now. I am recording the sound of my speaking voice *seems like the “I” tones appear as a higher whistle now* and I am going to play it back into the room again and again until the resonant frequencies of the room reinforce themselves so that any semblance of my speech with perhaps the exception of rhythm, is destroyed. What you will hear, then, are the natural resonant frequencies of the room articulated by speech. I regard this activity not so much as a demonstration of a physical fact, but more as a way to smooth out any irregularities my speech might have. (- 10:44 min) For me, this starts to sound like only squeaking waves of tones and noise. The high-pitched ones make it now very unpleasant to listen to.

Replay#8: (- 12:20 min) Honestly, now I am really not able to understand anything anymore. I even missed the start of replay and retape eight. Just a lot of squeaks and whistle like sound – some people would call them noises and I am one of those people.

Replay#9 and going on: I am definitely not able to track the start of each replay anymore. Listening to this is not anymore just “unpleasant.” Really. I am thinking about turning it off and it isn’t over for another two minutes. It seems as everything else but the feedback of the microphone is now completely subtracted.

In the end only the unique acoustics of this particular room are left. And also, my ears don’t stop ringing.

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Listening Report on John Oswald: Plexure

 Sarah Kumar Dr. Bernd Herzogenrath The Future of (American) Music 06 Mar. 2023 Listening Report on John Oswald: Plexure According to John Oswald, “[a] plunderphone is a recognizable sonic quote, using the actual sound of something familiar which has already been recorded” (Lecture Slides 18). However, only if the source stays recognizable can it be called plunderphonics. In his album Plexure , several songs are played back and mixed together, thus creating a new sound. This is interesting because while the excerpts of songs that are used are recognizable or at least sound familiar to some degree, played backwards and mashed up as they are in Plexure , they create a new sound. Like on the cover of the album, on which a collage making up a man can be seen, the mixing of different songs played backwards gives a new feeling to something known. The way the songs are mixed makes them unintelligible. The meaning of the words of the original recordings are not able to be compr...
Post a Comment
Read more

John Cage – Inlets

  This does not sound like music to me. Depending on the interpretation of different players or performers, this piece will always sound different. In this case, it sounds to me like someone is walking through a cave with water at the bottom, dragging their feet through it. Sometimes it sounds like water in a toilet bowl, especially when we hear the water in a bigger shell being swished around. These sounds are relaxing in the background, it is like a gentle stream of water. I just wonder what went through the head of the composer while writing this piece. But I guess he had some experimental ideas that are interesting to try out. Those shells are quite pretty, I have never seen such big ones that are not broken. I was surprised when something else happened towards the end of the piece. That tone which came out of the one shell was so clear, it sounded like a trumpet. I didn’t know that shells can sound like that. It was quite beautiful. It was a nice way to end the piece. I di...
Post a Comment
Read more

William Basinski – The Disintegration Loops III

  The Disintegration Loops is a quartet of albums published in 2002 and 2003 by American avant-garde composer William Basinski. The pieces are made up of tape loop recordings that were played over time, with noise and crackles rising as the tape deteriorated. Basinski noticed this effect when attempting to convert his older recordings to digital format. The completion of the recordings coincided with the September 11, 2001 events, which Basinski witnessed and adds a deeper meaning to the composition. The composition is fascinating in many ways and makes the listener lose track of time. The tape loop recording had a very calming effect on me and put me in a trance-like state when I listened to it in its entirety. The tape loop is really soothing, so much so that I didn't even notice the loss of quality when I first listened to it. It makes you forget about time and allows you to really get into the piece capturing the calmness it exudes. You forget or don't really notice how i...
Post a Comment
Read more