Melike
Yücel 15.12.2022
Seminar: The
Future of American Music
Instructor:
Prof. Dr. Bernd Herzogenrath
WS 22/23
Listening
Report 1: John Cage
Sonata II on
the prepared piano, played by Inara Ferreira
An excerpt of
“Sonatas and Interludes” (1946-48)
The
Sonata II, composed by avant-garde composer John Cage, is part of a larger
compositional piece called “Sonatas and Interludes” (1946-48), which represents
some of Cage’s earlier work. This piece is composed for the “prepared piano”, a
piano which has an assortment of different screws and bolts, and possibly other
materials and objects inserted into the instrument’s strings to alter the
sounds it produces. The pianist in the given source material is Inara Ferreira.
Listening
to the piece, it is immediately obvious to the listener, that this must be one
of Cage’s earlier works, due to the blend of traditional influences and modern
twists. At first, it does not seem too strange, but somewhat familiar: coming
close to an experimental piano piece, in which the piano sounds slightly out of
tune. The rhythmic flow is reminiscent of that of dance music, sometimes even
reminding one of the tunes of ringtones. There is no overarching frame of
composition, instead, short, and almost “choppy” sounding segments are followed
by another. These segments have dynamic rhythm and remnants of melody, which
are expressed in some immediate repetitions of rhythmic patterns, as well as
limited amounts of pitches and clearly separated phrases. Harmony, however, is
absent in this piece, and it seems intentionally absent. Instead of harmonies,
the piece is defined by percussive sounds that dominates its musical effect.
Therein lies the essence of what makes this piece so familiar yet so strange to
the listener: the piano, as the quintessential classical instrument of the 18th
and 19th century is being used to produce unfamiliar and deviating
sounds. Listening to this piece while omitting the visuals of the prepared
piano, one might assume that there were multiple instruments being played at
once. The piano now sounds like windchimes, a xylophone, and percussive
instruments such as handheld drums. It can now produce sounds like “thud” and
“clop” due to the preparation of it, which John Cage pioneered.
Preparing
the piano by insertion of screws of varying size (and other possible objects
emphasizes and takes full advantage of the percussive character of the piano: the
conventional sound is created by a hammer hitting strings in a big, hollow
case. There, the options for manipulating the sounds are various: creating
dissonance in a note by inserting a screw right in between one of its three
strings, or entirely blocking off parts of the hammers which are supposed to create
the notes by hitting the strings. Through Cage’s modulation of the piano, an
instrument known for the harmonious, melodic tunes that it conventionally produces,
has here unfolded an entirely new characteristic: the rhythmic and percussive
capabilities, which are explored in this Sonata. It is striking however, how
this was not applied to all tones and notes, but that there are a handful of
strings which were left “unprepared”, some strings were sparingly “prepared”,
and then again were strings which beheld a multitude of altering screws. This
created a sound amalgamation of old and new, familiar, and yet strange when
listening to the Sonata. Cage has therein successfully merged his ideas of a
progressive approach to music, which is to include any and all sounds or noises,
with that of the traditional, classical school of music, which is characterized
by melody, harmony, and resonance. The preparation leads to the dampening to
some of the notes, while others sound dissonant and split in two. Additionally,
the strings with insertions of a higher number of screws create sounds that are
shortened in its duration and compared to the rich timbre of a classical piano
note, now sound short and dull. Those sounds account for the percussive
character added to the instrument.
Moreover,
the antiteleological character of the Sonata is worth noting. While listening
to it, there is no discernible build-up to a climax, or “story” that is told
throughout the winding of sounds. It seems more as if it was different rhythmic
patterns assembled, their sequences arbitrary. The audience can only assume
that a continuation of some sort of patterned rhythmic structures will follow
another.
Comments
Post a Comment