In
the excerpt from MFA-IA Fall Residency at Goddard College, Pauline Oliveros
performs her well-known art of “deep listening“. The video is about 11 minutes
long and shows two women, who are in a well with a ladder on the wall. During
the video, the women climb the ladder up and down. Furthermore, three candles
are placed in the middle of the well. The walls of the well are painted with
graffiti. The overall setting of the recording is dark, overwhelming, and
oppressive. It seems as if the two woman are filmed by another women. The two
women are dancing in the video, walking around, and talking with each other.
Now
the question arises what one can hear when watching the video? The main sounds
one can hear are the dialogues between the two women one can see in the video
and the other woman, who is recording the video. Their voices can be heard as
their laughter. Furthermore, their dialogues are stressed out by the echo of
their voices in the well. When only listening to the sounds and not watching
the video, one might have the impression of being in the middle of the scenery
in the well. Still, I cannot hear what
the actors in the video say but only hear their laughter. According to Liang
Khong (2022), the distinction between hearing and listening was crucial for
Oliveros.[1] “Hearing, she writes, ‘represents the
primary sense organ - hearing happens involuntarily‘“, while listening happens
voluntarily. Oliveros’ well-known art of
“deep-listening“ is clearly hearable in the video. Such “deep-listening“
is based on being fully concentrated on the sound and feeling the sound with
all of your senses. Pauline Olivero’s composition is based on minimalism. In
contrast to conventional and regular compositions, Olivero’s work does not
contain any sounds of instruments or singing.
While
listening to Olivero’s composition, I had very uncommon, heavy, and gloomy
feelings. The feelings of the movement of the two women in the video arise the
feeling of experiencing a horror movie at close quarters. For minute 7.34 on, a
kind of holy music. This additional sound accentuates my gloomy impression even
more. However, I have to admit that the experience of listening to Olivero’s
composition, was a different experience. In contrast to other songs, one is not
distracted by hundreds of impressions, caused by the interaction of
instruments, technical sounds, and singing. To put it in a nutshell, I
experienced Olivero’s composition as different and interesting, although it
does not match the compositions of today’s artists and expectations.
Comments
Post a Comment